In re-reading this brilliant essay one should be reminded that the author was only 26 years old at the time and had not been brought up in Africa. Considering that, it is truly remarkable that he could have been so unfashionably 'illiberal' and so insightful into the African psyche.Carlos Whitlock Porter was born in 1947 in California in a family of Navy officers and lawyers. C.W. Porter studied in Europe, and is a professional translator and member of the Institute of Linguists. Since 1976, he has studied the Holocaust and war crimes trials with detailed patience and precision, including the related questions of law, toxicology and chemistry. Concerning the International Military Tribunal trial records, C.W. Porter's work exposes these kangaroo courts to have been absurd and hideous miscarriages of justice. The Nuremberg Trial records would be hysterically funny if they were not responsible for over fifty years of suffering and injustice. His main works are Made in Russia: The Holocaust and Not Guilty at Nuremberg.

What REALLY happened at the Nuremberg War Tribunals?

This book contains shocking evidence that they were little more than lynch-mob proceedings, resulting in the Most Corrupt Trial of The Twentieth Century

It shows that the trials broke every legal precedent and procedure of evidence in the book. Evidence Was Tainted from The Beginning, The Verdicts Planned and Agreed Upon from The Outset. No Cross Examinations of Prosecution Witnesses, Their Presence in Court Not Even Required.

Blatantly Fraudulent Documents Were Accepted as Fact Over and Over Again. Impossible Events Were Accepted Into 'Evidence' With No Scientific Proof of Opportunity for Rebuttal.

Uninformed people consider the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials as the ultimate proof of the guilt of the German leadership before and during World War II. The transcripts of the proceedings, however, tell an entirely different story.

What You Will Read In This Book Is So Astonishing that you may find yourself reaching the Same Conclusion As Have So Many Others When Shown The Truth....

NOT guilty at Nuremberg...

A stumbling block for Revisionists, just as it was for the post-war German defendants, is the seeming wealth of documents and testimony assembled by Allied prosecutors for the Nuremberg trials. The more than sixty volumes of trial material which appeared in the wake of the Trial of the Major War Criminals and twelve subsequent trials before the (American) Nuremberg Military Tribunal have for many years supplied a massive compilation of apparently damning evidence against Germany's National Socialist regime. Most Exterminationists, academic and lay, believe that Germany's aggression in beginning the war, and the numerous atrocities and war crimes laid to the German account, above all the alleged Holocaust of European Jewry, are amply documented in the so-called Nuremberg record.

Approximately 10,000 War Crimes Trials have been held since 1945. Trials of Japanese military personnel ended in 1949, yet war crimes trials of Germans and Eastern Europeans continue to date.

Almost invariably, the charge is violation of the laws and customs of war, derived, in turn, from international conventions signed at the Hague in 1899 and 1907.

That these trials have little or no basis in law is clear from the wording of the treaties which are said to have been violated.

The illegalities of war crimes proceedings include the admissi­bility of oral and written hearsay; the introduction of the concept of conspiracy into international law (unknown prior to 1945); the total lack of any pre-trial inquest or forensic evidence; and trial before a court itself composed of actual war criminals.

To quote the writings of Telford Taylor:

The issues surrounding the war crimes trials are numerous and complex; discussion and criticism of what was done should be welcomed by all who hope for a continuing development of inter­national law... but what should have been done instead is a problem generally ignored by those who condemn what was done in fact.⁹⁹

The alternative is a fair trial before an impartial court under existing procedures and proper rules of evidence.

Cet ouvrage est le livret d'accompagnement de la vid o de 90 minutes qui pr sente les documents du premier proc s de Nuremberg intitul Made In Russia: The Holocaust, tir du livre du m me nom, vid o r alis e par Carlos W. Porter et Ernst Z ndel en 1988, au Luxembourg.

In the late summer of 1988, on location in Luxembourg, together with the late Ernst Z ndel and his video cameraman, Carlos made a 90 minute video presentation of documents from the First Nuremberg Trial entitled: MADE IN RUSSIA: THE HOLOCAUST, taken from the original book of the same name.

That repression causes neurosis is a truism of the modern world. This applies chiefly to sexual matters. It does not apply to racial matters (at least not when expressed by whites). It is the hypothesis of this authority (i.e., myself) that millions of white Americans are suffering from serious neurotic symptoms caused by the repression of their racial feelings. Freud believed that neurosis would cure itself through the catharsis κάθαρσις] of analysis, i.e., the expression - u erung - of repressed feelings verdr ngten Empfindungen - . It is the hope of this practitioner that the present modest volume may make some small contribution to the therapy of racially repressed white persons in situations of difficulty. Carlos Whitlock Porter 19 September 2013.

A collection of letters received by Carlos W. Porter, with his replies. - Letter from Catherine Colohen. Note on the Difference between Fascists and National Socialists. Half-Jewish Pro-Lifer Demands Retraction and Apology. From Tony Cavanaugh, Ex-British Intelligence. Gerard M. on Soviet Atrocities. From a Japanese-American (On the Chinese, Koreans and Hara-Kiri). From a Former U.S. Intelligence Officer on Irma Grese.

Les personnes non inform es consid rent les Proc s de crimes de guerre de Nuremberg comme la preuve d finitive de la culpabilit des dirigeants allemands avant et durant la Deuxi me Guerre mondiale. La transcription des d bats raconte toutefois une histoire bien diff rente. Ce livre contient les arguments de la d fense avanc s par les principaux accus s au cours des proc s. Il montre que ces proc s ont enfreint toute la jurisprudence existante et les r gles de proc dure d'administration des preuves. On a refus des accus s le droit de contre-interroger des t moins, on a accept sans h sitation comme authentiques des documents ouvertement falsifi s et les preuves indiquant que des suspects avaient t tortur s ont t cart es sur ordre des juges.